Evaluation of sustainability criteria for small-scale wastewater treatment facilities

Abstract: There are about 700,000 on-site sewage facilities (OSSFs) in Sweden, almost a quarter of which amount only to septic tanks for sludge collection and removal, with no form of post-treatment. All these OSSFs contribute about 10 % of the total anthropogenic phosphorus (P) load from Swedish coasts to the Baltic Sea. They also leak a considerable, but hard to quantify, amount of micropollutants (MPs). This is a large, diverse group of organic trace contaminants, including e.g., pharmaceuticals and detergents. The interests concerning OSSFs in Sweden have over time shifted from merely disposal issues, to health (removal of pathogens) and then further on to nutrient leakage.   In recent years there has been a growing interest in a more comprehensive sustainability perspective. In that spirit, during this thesis project, environmental (n=5) and socio-economic (n=5) criteria were assessed for three conceptualized, full-scale OSSFs. The evaluation was based on the efficiency of domestic wastewater treatment from a single household. These systems comprised conventional post-treatment, as well as extra capabilities for treating P and MPs. The evaluation was done with a multi-criteria analysis (MCA), the goal of which was to provide a proof-of-concept analysis of these treatment technologies in order to serve as decision-support at a national policy level.   The first of the decision options was a sandbed filter with Polonite® and Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) filters, for the adsorption of P and MPs, respectively. The second option was a reference package treatment system (PTSs), with flocculation chemicals for the precipitation of P, but nothing for the removal of MPs. The third solution was another PTSs, but with Polonite and GAC filters. The stakeholders chosen in this study were the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM), a municipal regulator and a property owner. A total of 100 weight points were assigned to the 10 sustainability criteria. The minimum and maximum of these created a range for each criterion, which was multiplied with the grades 1-5 and added together.   The most sustainable alternative in this study was found to be the sandbed filter with 102-694 points (mid-range of 398), followed by the PTSs reference with 79-560 points (mid-range of 319.5) and the PTSs with filters with 82-500 points (mid-range of 291). The property owner put the highest weight on the economy, while SwAM put the highest weight on the environmental criteria, and the regulator on the social criteria. The sensitivity analysis indicated possible impact by changing the ranking position between the PTSs. This was deemed likeliest for the weight change of life-cycle costs and the grade change of the ease of compliance (legislative) criterion, but the highest ranking of the sandbed filter seemed hard to budge.