Does operating a UCAV make it casual for pilots to execute a remote lethal strike?

Abstract: The use of unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAV) is relativity new with the first known lethal strike taking place in 2001. Few systems are operational but many are in development. The use of UCAVs is debated and many claim that UCAVs make it casual for the pilots to kill, and the pilots are not able to differentiate the ethics of what they do from those of a video game. When researched it is found that some factors regarding the use of UCAVs may make a pilot less reluctant to execute a remote lethal strike, yet it does not make it casual. The pilots know that what they do has real world implications and what they see on their screens are real people. Contrary to some people’s beliefs, UCAV pilots may have a greater connection with their victim as well as a greater reluctance towards killing compared to bomber pilots.