Essays about: "significant impediment to effective competition"

Found 3 essays containing the words significant impediment to effective competition.

  1. 1. Merger Control in the EU: When is an Impediment to Effective Competition Significant?

    University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

    Author : Iiris Matilda Tuohimaa; [2022]
    Keywords : EU Merger Control; SIEC Test; Horizontal Mergers; Oligopolistic Markets; Unilateral Effects; Law and Political Science;

    Abstract : Merger control is an important component of competition law in the EU. There are two levels of merger control in the EU. The first level is EU merger control for transactions that have an EU dimension, which fall within the jurisdiction of the Commission under the EU Merger Regulation. READ MORE

  3. 2. Merger Control Unchained – On the legal (un)certainty of the substantive test in EU merger control

    University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

    Author : Tilda Sandberg; [2021]
    Keywords : EU law; civil and criminal procedure; competition law; merger control; legal certainty; significant impediment to effective competition; Law and Political Science;

    Abstract : Det nuvarande substantiella testet i EUs regim för koncentrationskontroll infördes år 2004 i syfte att täcka koncentrationer mellan företag som påtagligt skulle hämma den effektiva konkurrensen på marknaden utan att skapa eller förstärka en dominant position. Koncentrationer som ger upphov till sådana så kallade icke-samordnade effekter uppkommer typiskt sett på oligopolmarknader, varför den upplevda luckan i lagstiftningen kallades ”oligopolgapet”. READ MORE

  4. 3. Collective Dominance under EC Merger Regulation No 139/2004

    University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen

    Author : Elina Fagerlund; [2005]
    Keywords : European Affairs; Law and Political Science;

    Abstract : The previous substantive test in Article 2(3) of the Merger Regulation 4064/89 had as its cornerstone the concept of dominance. The test that is also referred as dominance test, declared incompatible with the common market concentrations that would create or strengthen a dominant position as a result of which competition would be significantly impeded. READ MORE