Evaluation of THUMS Human FE Model in Oblique Frontal Sled Tests against Post Mortem Human Subject Test Data
Abstract: Last year 319 people were killed in traffic accidents in Sweden. The majority of these were car drivers andpassengers. In order to minimize the number of people killed in traffic, vehicle safety is very important.Crash tests are frequently used to develop safety systems in cars. Both mechanical testing with crash dummiesand simulations with mathematical models of the crash dummies are used. However, a disadvantage with thecrash dummies is that they have limited biofidelity in order to be durable for repeatable testing. Thereforethere is a difference between their kinematics in a collision compared to the kinematics of humans.To be able to predict the response of a human body, mathematical human body models have recently beendeveloped, e.g. the Total HUman Model for Safety (THUMS). Since THUMS is a relatively new modelthere have been limited validation done to establish its kinematic performance. In pure frontal impact somevalidations have been done, by means of pendulum and sled tests, but in oblique frontal impacts, a rathercommon crash situation, no evaluation have been done.The aim of this project is to evaluate the kinematics of THUMS version 2.21 against Post Mortem HumanSubjects (PMHS) in oblique frontal collisions. Two sled test series with belted PMHS and Hybrid III 50thpercentile male (HIII) dummies have been used in the project. The velocities in the tests were approximately30 km/h and the acceleration pulses in the sleds were approximately 13 g.The two sled setups have been modelled and simulated with an HIII dummy model and with THUMS. The HIIIsimulations were used to validate the sled environment and then THUMS was evaluated against the PMHSdata. The results consist of belt force, acceleration and displacement comparisons between the mechanical testresults and the mathematical model predictions. The results from the HIII simulations shows good conformitywith the HIII dummy test results for both sled environments.In the THUMS evaluation there are issues with THUMS interaction with the simulated seat belt. The beltelements entangle with the elements in the neck and the chest of THUMS and the belt therefore get stuck.However, THUMS replicates post mortem human kinematics even though THUMS appears to be somewhatstiffer than the PMHS.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE WHOLE ESSAY. (in PDF format)