Quantification of cerebral blood flow with 15O-water PET : A comparison study between PET/CT and PET/MR and two different blood sampling instruments

Abstract: Cerebral blood flow quantification is a vital diagnostic tool for disease monitoring and used for diagnosing a variation of pathological conditions. The human brain requires roughly about 20 % of the total cardiac output to sustain normal functioning, hence the perfusion of blood is an important factor to deliver oxygenated blood. The golden standard for quantifying the cerebral blood flow follows by measurement with dynamic positron emission tomography of 15O-labelled water modelled by tracer kinetic compartments. For implementation, knowledge of an input function must exist which is in general being sampled through arterial cannulation of the radial artery with a continuous sampling instrument. The core of this thesis is to establish if two sampling instruments contradicts in comparison to each other when sampling the data to the input function.  In total 22 subjects underwent a 10-minute dynamic  15O-labeled water brain PET scan on two imaging modalities PET/CT and PET/MR. Continuous arterial sampling was performed either by a Veenstra on PET/CT or a Swisstrace on PET/MR during a baseline scan. In two subjects the two sampling instruments were coupled in series and imaged solely on the PET/CT.  Cerebral blood flow analysis was done comparing varying dispersion times, the two imaging modalities compared each other and comparing the calculated and measured blood flows obtained through this study with the values obtained prior. To be able to compare the values showing inconsistency to the values obtained through this thesis, a comparison between two different iterative reconstruction methods was done. Here the method of ordered subsets expectation maximum was compared to a Bayesian penalized-likelihood method. To further compare the two sampling instruments an image derived input function was constructed and compared with the blood sampled input function. The results showed that there was no significant difference between measured cerebral blood flow between the two imaging modalities with the currently used reconstruction method based on Bayesian penalized likelihood but presented in the earlier data there was an inconsistency. A dispersion analysis with variation on the external dispersion time shows that if the time was chosen to low or to high compared to the standard time used it introduced distorted fitted models of the activity curves. This distortion creates further errors in the calculation of the cerebral blood flow, however with the analysis the standard dispersion time could be confirmed as an accurate fit. Subjects imaged with the two sampling instruments in series showed no significant difference except for the measured values on Veenstra to be slightly higher. Lastly the correlation between the image derived input function and the blood sampled input function showed poorly performance. Only a R2 value of 0.42 was achieved on the PET/CT while a meagre R2 value of 0.18 was achieved on the PET/MR. Although the correlation was poorly, the plotted activity curves from the two functions showed a representable appearance between each other.