Participatory cycling planning: challenges and strategies : The cases of Stockholm and Madrid

Abstract: Cities develop cycling plans as a tool to promote urban sustainable mobility. These plans are usually open to the participation of current cyclists. In some cases, an intense debate among them arises. Part of them defend the integration of cyclists in a calmer urban traffic, while others prefer dedicated cycling infrastructure separated from motor vehicles. This debate is often framed in terms of what would be more valuable for potential cyclists. Taking this blocking debate as motivation, this thesis explores the cycling planning network of stakeholders generated by participatory planning initiatives. Two study cases with different observed intensities of the described debate, Stockholm and Madrid, are analyzed. The project identifies the stakeholders engaged in cycling planning, both from institutions and civil society; makes a characterization of their relations; and studies the claims they make in relation to the interests of potential cyclists. The research is based in snowball sampling, interviews, questionnaires and social media data mining. The resultant networks combine a set of institutions embedded in a multilevel cycling governance landscape with a set of civil society entities, many characterized by organizational informality partly due to the emergence of virtual communities among them. Accordingly,informal channels of participation are very relevant. The analyzed debate produces tensions, but these are transient frictions grounded in two coexistent systems of meaning rather than permanent antagonism. This is consistent with agonist planning theories. In regard of these challenges, two strategic approaches to the design of participatory cycling planning are suggested: disaggregated stakeholder analysis, in order to reach all the diversity of stakeholders; and bigrelational data analysis, in order to have a first approximation to the particularities of any cycling planning network.