Comparative LCA of Electrolyzers for Hydrogen Gas Production

Abstract: The need for energy and fuels is predicted to grow within the next decades, in parallel to the need of decreasing the emissions to air and water to operate within the planetary boundaries. The alternatives to consider as energy or fuel options need to be environmentally friendly, evaluated over the whole life cycle. Hydrogen is one of the considered alternatives because it contains no carbon and has a good environmental performance when produced from renewable sources. It can be produced by a variety of methods, where electrolyzers have a good potential environmental impact if powered by renewable energy. Electrolyzers cleave water into hydrogen and oxygen, by using electricity and water. There are currently four technologies on the market or under development but there is a lack of LCA-studies that compare these. This study is an attributional LCA-study, evaluating the potential environmental performance of two electrolyzers: PEMEC and SOEC. The result from this study is thereafter compared to a parallel study of one other electrolyzer: Alkaline. The LCA study considers six impact categories: Abiotic Depletion (element), Abiotic Depletion (fossil), Acidification Potential, Eutrophication Potential, Global Warming Potential and Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential. The system boundary is set as cradle to gate. The electricity source for hydrogen production is evaluated in a sensitivity analysis, together with a scenario of future estimated developments. The electricity during hydrogen production has the highest impact of the life cycle for PEMEC and SOEC, where the energy source has a great impact on the result. PEMEC has the lowest potential environmental impact, in comparison to Alkaline and SOEC, which comes from low energy consumption and low weight of materials with high environmental impact.