Unravelling the discursive fabric of climate tipping points : An analysis and structuring of views in the scientific discourse

Abstract: The notion of climate tipping points (CTP:s) has gained traction in academia. Unravelling the intricate weave of views in the discourses surrounding CTP:s can be helpful to structure the views in the discursive fabric of climate tipping points and in turn get a better understanding of the views surrounding the phenomenon. This study aims to clarify the different views on climate tipping points by creating a set of distinct ideal types based on the scientific literature surrounding CTP:s. Furthermore, we analyse these views and reflect on their relationship and functions through textual analysis. The analysis yielded four reoccurring, interconnected themes: Knowledge, View on (Ir)reversibility, Risk and Action. Using these themes, we created four ideal types to help intellectually structure the weave of differing views. Furthermore, we found that the relationship between the views on these themes and the acceptance of climate tipping points often is convertibly indicative. The analysis of the literature also revealed that CTP:s have much in common with climate change in large and reifies the urgency, risk implications, uncertainties, and suggested actions expressed in broader climate change literature. A key insight is that accepting CTP:s is not pivotal for voicing strong concerns about climate change but rather they may serve as a metaphoric tool for scientists in communicating climate change issues.