The effect of different techniques on suspension in aesthetic finger prosthetics

University essay from Jönköping University/HHJ. Ortopedteknisk plattform

Author: Lucas Van 't Ende; Marianne Andreasen; [2023]

Keywords: ;

Abstract: Aesthetic finger prosthetics provide functional and cosmetic benefits. Good suspension of the prosthesis plays a role in the functional and aesthetic effects, and a loose fit can lead to rejection of the prosthetic.  In this thesis, we will compare two different suspension techniques (the addition of ridges and the addition of a central tunnel) and their effect on prosthetic retention along with the effect of differing socket lengths. Method: Six finger prosthetics were fabricated with different techniques and lengths. The strength of suspension was evaluated using a novel approach. Results: Shorter sockets with more aggressive volume reduction resisted a mean maximum force of 9.25N, and the longer sockets resisted a mean force up till 32.66N. The prosthetic with a central tunnel and shorter socket resisted a mean force up till 46.04N. Ridges between short and long sockets had inconsistent readings. Conclusion: Whether ridges or central tunnel influenced suspension strength was inconclusive. How volume reductions were done had a notable effect on suspension. Prosthetics with a shorter socket provided a tighter fit and had better suspension. When adequate prosthetic fit was achieved, the central tunnel had an improved effect on suspension strength.

  AT THIS PAGE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE WHOLE ESSAY. (follow the link to the next page)