Essays about: "Bilateral Investment Treaties"

Showing result 21 - 23 of 23 essays containing the words Bilateral Investment Treaties.

  1. 21. The Interaction of Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) Clauses With Dispute Settlement Provisions in Investment Treaties : A New Continent to Discover?

    University essay from Juridiska institutionen

    Author : Alexander Koch; [2007]
    Keywords : most-favored-nation clause; most-favoured-nation clause; most favored nation; most favoured nation; dispute settlement; dispute resolution; investment arbitration; Maffezini; Siemens;

    Abstract : The master thesis provides a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the scope of most-favoured-nation clauses, focusing on the application of such clauses to dispute resolution mechanisms in bilateral investment treaty’s (BIT). The ICSID decision in Maffezini was the first in a series to extend the scope of an MFN clause to dispute resolution in such context. READ MORE

  2. 22. The Cost of Uncertainty - The notion of investment in Bilateral Investment Treaties and ICSID Arbitration

    University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen

    Author : Rita Gustafsson; [2007]
    Keywords : Processrätt; Law and Political Science;

    Abstract : Bilateral Investment Treaties (BIT) are entered into by two state signatories wishing to promote, protect and liberalize investments. A BIT protects a private party, that is an investor having made an investment, by allowing for such a private party to address judicial recourse against a state signatory under the Washington Convention (the Convention). READ MORE

  3. 23. The added value of the UN Draft Norms as compared to existing codes on Corporate Social Responsibility and their legal status

    University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen

    Author : Anna Bohman; [2006]
    Keywords : International Human Rights Law; Law and Political Science;

    Abstract : When the United Nations was created in 1945, states were the only significant decision-makers. Even with the construction of the human rights regime in the aftermath of the Second World War, states were designated as the only duty-bearers who could violate international human rights law. READ MORE