Managing diversity : the forest development types as a framework for management within mixed forest systems

University essay from SLU/Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management (from 130101)

Abstract: The demand for both biodiversity and recreational forests is increasing. Management methods under the umbrella term Close-to-Nature management, which aims to incorporate natural successional patterns and disturbances, is considered preferable to traditional forest management methods in terms of both recreational and ecological values (Wimberly et al. 2012). Within Close-to-Nature management, the Forest Development Types model provides a guide for developing suitable strategies of regional conditions(Larsen & Nielsen 2012a). This paper aims to apply the model in a peri-urban woodland environment surrounding a new housing development area in Hässleholm, Sweden. The findings demonstrate the strengths and limitations of using the FDTs for as a reference system when enhancing ecological values and long-term resilience in urban woodlands. While also highlighting the need for additional guidance within recreational forests on post-establishment management. The insights gained from this research provide valuable guidance for policymakers, urban planners, and forest managers seeking to enhance the ecological values and long-term resilience of urban woodlands, ultimately contributing to the creation of more livable and sustainable cities.

  AT THIS PAGE YOU CAN DOWNLOAD THE WHOLE ESSAY. (follow the link to the next page)