Advanced search

Found 4 essays matching the above criteria.

1. 1. 'Sins of the Past' - Protection of Fundamental Rights in Individual Sanctions in the Historical, Institutional, and Judicial CFSP Context

   University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen; Lunds universitet/Juridiska fakulteten

   Author : André Blomquist; [2023]
   Keywords : EU law; legal history; law; CFSP; Common Foreign and Security Policy; Fundamental Rights; Human Rights; EPC; EU Foreign Policy; Sanctions; Individual Restrictive Measures; Individual Sanctions; CLaw-back rule; Carve-out rule; jurisdiction in CFSP; Competence of the Union CFSP; CFSP History; EU autonomous sanctions; Article 275 TFEU; Article 215 TFEU; European Political Cooperation; Opinion 2 13; Law and Political Science;

   Abstract : Since 24 February 2022, the European Union has faced a conventional war on its doorstep and an increase in geopolitical tension with the East. This has required the Council to act quickly and forcefully within its competence in the area of Common Foreign and Security Policy. READ MORE

3. 2. Women’s Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Inclusion of Gender Provisions

   University essay from Uppsala universitet/Statsvetenskapliga institutionen

   Author : Isolde Tengbjer Jobarteh; [2019]
   Keywords : Peace negotiation; peace agreement; UN; Security Council Resolution 1325; gender equality; women’s participation; representation; female signatories; gender provisions; intra-state conflict;

   Abstract : Are peace agreements more likely to include gender provisions if women participate in the peace negotiations? The international community, national governments and civil societies around the world have assumed that women’s inclusion in peace negotiations result in higher quality peace agreements, where women’s interests are better taken into consideration. To date, there is a lack of empirical underpinning of the assumption. READ MORE

4. 3. Balancing Power in the Middle East : A study of the purposes and effectiveness of the Iran Sanctions

   University essay from Högskolan Dalarna/Statsvetenskap

   Author : Angelica Knudsen; [2017]
   Keywords : Iran. Iran.Iran.Iran. Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Islamic Revolution. Iran Sanctions. Balance of Power. Logic Choice. International Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations. Sanctions. Coercion; constraining; and signalling. Effect of Relations.;

   Abstract : This study has two main purposes; to study the reasons of why sanctions were imposed on Iran, and evaluating the success of the sanctions. The study suggests that the disclosure of the Iranian nuclear program had consequences on the power balance in the Middle East, with Iran imposing a threat to regional neighbours and worrying the international community, leading to the United Nations Security Council imposing heavy sanctions on Iran in 2006. READ MORE

5. 4. Broadening the mandate of the Security Council - HIV/AIDS as a threat to international peace and security

   University essay from Lunds universitet/Juridiska institutionen

   Author : David Karlsson; [2003]
   Keywords : Folkrätt; Law and Political Science;

   Abstract : The question of international peace and security today includes far more than merely weapons and balance of power. The cold war conception of state security with primary focus on external aggression failed to offer adequate protection against the everyday threats facing the people of the world - threats that often are more tangible than a looming threat of war. READ MORE