Real versus Simulated data for Image Reconstruction : A comparison between training with sparse simulated data and sparse real data

Abstract: Our study investigates how training with sparse simulated data versus sparse real data affects image reconstruction. We compared on several criteria such as number of events, speed and high dynamic range, HDR. The results indicate that the difference between simulated data and real data is not large. Training with real data performed often better, but only by 2%. The findings confirm what earlier studies have shown; training with simulated data generalises well, even when training on sparse datasets as this study shows.